Libet's experiment provides no evidence against strong libertarian free will because it investigates the wrong kind of action

von Wachter, Daniel (2012) Libet's experiment provides no evidence against strong libertarian free will because it investigates the wrong kind of action. Submitted. (Submitted)

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Libet-urges.pdf

Download (98kB) | Preview

Abstract

While other philosophers have pointed out that Libet's experiment is compatible with compatibilist free will and also with some kinds of libertarian free will, this article argues that it is even compatible with strong libertarian free will, \ie a person's ability to initiate causal processes. It is widely believed that Libet's experiment has shown that all our actions have preceding unconscious causes. This article argues that Libet's claim that the actions he investigated are voluntary is false. They are motivated by urges, and therefore the experiment shows at most that our urges have preceding unconscious causes, which is what also strong libertarianism leads us to expect.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: free will, Libet, neuroscience
Subjects: Philosophie > Philosophische Disziplinen > Metaphysik
Depositing User: Prof. Dr. Dr. Daniel von Wachter
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2013 07:40
Last Modified: 12 Mar 2013 07:40
URI: http://sammelpunkt.philo.at/id/eprint/2222

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year