¿Está mal formulado el principio que mejor se conoce? (Defensa de la formulación aristotélica del principio de contradicción frente a la crítica de Kant)

Rovira, Rogelio (2005) ¿Está mal formulado el principio que mejor se conoce? (Defensa de la formulación aristotélica del principio de contradicción frente a la crítica de Kant). Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía, 24 (2). pp. 17-26. ISSN 0210-1602

[img]
Preview
PDF
Dialnet-EstaMalFormuladoElPrincipioQueMejorSeConoce-1254279.pdf

Download (201kB) | Preview

Abstract

In his Critique of Pure Reason Kant proposes two objections against the Aristotelian formulation of the principle of contradiction: “It is impossible that something should simultaneously both be and not be”. This formulation, Kant thinks, superfluously introduces the apodictic certainty and, above all, limits the principle with a temporal restriction. In this paper these two objections are expounded and critically evaluated. The result of this examination is that Kant’s criticism rests on serious misunderstandings and, therefore, it has no validity.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Philosophie > Philosophische Journale, Kongresse, Vereinigungen > Teorema. Revista internacional de filosofia > Volume XXIV (2005)
Depositing User: Sissi Kemp
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2013 16:56
Last Modified: 10 Nov 2013 16:56
URI: http://sammelpunkt.philo.at/id/eprint/2342

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year