Defending Design Arguments Against Plantinga

von Wachter, Daniel (2013) Defending Design Arguments Against Plantinga. Not to be disclosed. (Submitted)

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Wachter-2014-design.pdf

Download (84kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article criticises Alvin Plantinga's claim that basic design beliefs, which arise without a conscious inference, have more positive epistemic status than non-basic ones and that we cannot evaluate the probabilities involved in inferential, inductive design arguments.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Alvin Plantinga, design argument, basic belief
Subjects: Philosophie > Philosophische Disziplinen > Religionsphilosophie, Religionskritik
Depositing User: Prof. Dr. Dr. Daniel von Wachter
Date Deposited: 26 May 2015 10:15
Last Modified: 26 May 2015 10:15
URI: http://sammelpunkt.philo.at/id/eprint/2390

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year