Gibt es einzig richtige moralische Entscheidungen? - Eine Übersicht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der gegenwärtigen Diskussion -

Horster, Detlef (2004) Gibt es einzig richtige moralische Entscheidungen? - Eine Übersicht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der gegenwärtigen Diskussion -. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 90 (2). pp. 226-236.

[thumbnail of horster_arsp.pdf] PDF
horster_arsp.pdf

Download (39kB)

Abstract

We search an answer to the following moral questions: "Is abortion allowed or not?" or "Is it allowed to use embryos for research or not?" We want to find one clear answer to our questions. Can we hope to find an answer? With reference to an answer we know some different moral theories. A cognitive philosopher doesn't see a difference between facts and values. He says that moral values are facts and there is a right answer to every moral question. In different theories moral facts are established in intuition, in moral feeling or in common sense. A non-cognitive philosopher denies this position. David McNaughton said that cognitivism and noncognitivism are our two best moral theories. Both positions with some greater differentiations will be explained.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Kognitivismus, Nichtkognitivismus
Subjects: Philosophie > Philosophische Disziplinen > Allgemeine Ethik
Depositing User: sandra subito
Date Deposited: 06 Dec 2020 13:21
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2020 13:21
URI: http://sammelpunkt.philo.at/id/eprint/2521

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item