Critique of the Doctrine of Inalienable, Natural Rights

Bentham, Jeremy (1843) Critique of the Doctrine of Inalienable, Natural Rights. Anarchical Fallacies, 2.

[thumbnail of bentham.html] HTML

Download (29kB)


The Declaration of Rights -- I mean the paper published under that name by the French National Assembly in 1791 -- assumes for its subject-matter a field of disquisition as unbounded in point of extent as it is important in its nature. But the more ample the extent given to any proposition or string of propositions, the more difficult it is to keep the import of it confined without deviation, within the bounds of truth and reason. If in the smallest corners of the field it ranges over, it fail of coinciding with the line of rigid rectitude, no sooner is the aberration pointed out, than (inasmuch as there is no medium between truth and falsehood) its pretensions to the appellation of truism are gone, and whoever looks upon it must recognise it to be false and erroneous, -- and if, as here, political conduct be the theme, so far as the error extends and fails of being detected, pernicious.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Natural Rights; Declaration of Rights; French Revolution
Subjects: Philosophie > Geschichte der Philosophie > f) 19.Jahrhundert
Philosophie > Philosophische Disziplinen > Allgemeine Ethik
Depositing User: Wolfgang Heuer
Date Deposited: 06 Dec 2020 14:09
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2020 14:09

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item