<mods:mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Kierkegaard's POSTSCRIPT and Wittgenstein's Tractatus: Teaching How to Pass from Disguised to Patent Nonsense</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">James</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Conant</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>There is a tradition of philosophical writing -- one which can be traced back to  Plato's  dialogues -- in  which  the form of  the philosophical text is thought to be integral to its purpose.  The form  of the text   is modeled on    a PROCESS of  discovery. The relation  the reader  is invited  to  enter into   with the text mirrors a relation that he is   called upon to  enter into with himself. This mode of philosophical  writing will often seem  to be  less concerned  with imparting   a specific  doctrine to  the reader and more concerned with introducing him to an intellectual discipline that holds  forth the   promise of transforming him.
</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Sprachphilosophie</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Wittgenstein Studien 1994-97</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">1997</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>