Lammenranta, Markus Supervenience and Meta-Justification. In: Pre-Proceedings of the 26th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, Kirchberg am Wechsel, pp. 186-188.
![[thumbnail of lammenranta.pdf]](http://sammelpunkt.philo.at/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
PDF
lammenranta.pdf
Download (123kB)
Abstract
The central coherentist critique of foundationalism brings
forward a requirement of meta-justification for putative
basic beliefs, which means that the beliefs are not basic
after all. The foundationalist response denies this requirement,
because it is in conflict with the doctrine of supervenience.
Recently, one of the principal members of the
coherentist camp, Keith Lehrer (1997, 60-77), suggested
coherentists should reject this doctrine in order to maintain
their advantage over foundationalist theories of justification.
| Item Type: | Book Section |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Coherentism; Foundationalism; Scepticism; Chisholm, R. |
| Subjects: | Philosophie > Philosophische Disziplinen > Epistemologie, Wissenschaftstheorie, Naturphilosophie Philosophie > Philosophische Journale, Kongresse, Vereinigungen > Wittgenstein Symposium Kirchberg, Pre-Proceedings > Kirchberg 2003 |
| Depositing User: | Wolfgang Heuer |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Dec 2020 14:49 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2020 14:49 |
| URI: | http://sammelpunkt.philo.at/id/eprint/3081 |
Actions (login required)
- View Item